↓ Skip to main content

Recommendations for the Management of Hepatitis C Virus Infection Among People Who Inject Drugs

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Infectious Diseases, July 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
9 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
2 X users
facebook
4 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
101 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
88 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Recommendations for the Management of Hepatitis C Virus Infection Among People Who Inject Drugs
Published in
Clinical Infectious Diseases, July 2013
DOI 10.1093/cid/cit302
Pubmed ID
Authors

Geert Robaeys, Jason Grebely, Stefan Mauss, Philip Bruggmann, Joseph Moussalli, Andrea De Gottardi, Tracy Swan, Amber Arain, Achim Kautz, Heino Stöver, Heiner Wedemeyer, Martin Schaefer, Lynn Taylor, Markus Backmund, Olav Dalgard, Maria Prins, Gregory J. Dore, on behalf of the International Network on Hepatitis in Substance Users

Abstract

In the developed world, the majority of new and existing hepatitis C virus (HCV) infections occur among people who inject drugs (PWID). The burden of HCV-related liver disease in this group is increasing, but treatment uptake among PWID remains low. Among PWID, there are a number of barriers to care that should be considered and systematically addressed, but these barriers should not exclude PWID from HCV treatment. Furthermore, it has been clearly demonstrated that HCV treatment is safe and effective across a broad range of multidisciplinary healthcare settings. Given the burden of HCV-related disease among PWID, strategies to enhance HCV assessment and treatment in this group are urgently needed. These recommendations demonstrate that treatment among PWID is feasible and provides a framework for HCV assessment, management, and treatment. Further research is needed to evaluate strategies to enhance assessment, adherence, and SVR among PWID, particularly as new treatments for HCV infection become available.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 88 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 88 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 16 18%
Student > Master 10 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 11%
Other 9 10%
Student > Postgraduate 8 9%
Other 23 26%
Unknown 12 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 39 44%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 7%
Social Sciences 6 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 5%
Psychology 3 3%
Other 14 16%
Unknown 16 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 72. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 November 2013.
All research outputs
#508,566
of 22,958,253 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Infectious Diseases
#983
of 15,816 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,154
of 198,638 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Infectious Diseases
#7
of 219 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,958,253 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 15,816 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 198,638 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 219 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.