You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Immunodeficiency at the Start of Combination Antiretroviral Therapy in Low-, Middle-, and High-Income Countries
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
JAIDS: Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes, January 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1097/qai.0b013e3182a39979 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Dorita Avila, Keri N Althoff, Catrina Mugglin, Kara Wools-Kaloustian, Manuel Koller, François Dabis, Denis Nash, Thomas Gsponer, Somnuek Sungkanuparph, Catherine McGowan, Margaret May, David Cooper, Cleophas Chimbetete, Marcelo Wolff, Ann Collier, Hamish McManus, Mary-Ann Davies, Dominique Costagliola, Brenda Crabtree-Ramirez, Romanee Chaiwarith, Angela Cescon, Morna Cornell, Lameck Diero, Praphan Phanuphak, Adrien Sawadogo, Jochen Ehmer, Serge P Eholie, Patrick C K Li, Matthew P Fox, Neel R Gandhi, Elsa González, Christopher K C Lee, Christopher J Hoffmann, Andrew Kambugu, Olivia Keiser, Rossana Ditangco, Hans Prozesky, Fiona Lampe, Nagalingeswaran Kumarasamy, Mari Kitahata, Emmanuel Lugina, Rita Lyamuya, Saphonn Vonthanak, Valeria Fink, Antonella d'Arminio Monforte, Paula Mendes Luz, Yi-Ming A Chen, Albert Minga, Jordi Casabona, Albert Mwango, Jun Y Choi, Marie-Louise Newell, Elizabeth A Bukusi, Kapella Ngonyani, Tuti P Merati, Juliana Otieno, Mwebesa B Bosco, Sam Phiri, Oon T Ng, Kathryn Anastos, Jürgen Rockstroh, Ignacio Santos, Shinichi Oka, Geoffrey Somi, Christoph Stephan, Ramon Teira, Deo Wabwire, Gilles Wandeler, Andrew Boulle, Peter Reiss, Robin Wood, Benjamin H Chi, Carolyn Williams, Jonathan A Sterne, Matthias Egger |
| Abstract |
To describe the CD4 cell count at the start of combination antiretroviral therapy (cART) in low-income (LIC), lower middle-income (LMIC), upper middle-income (UMIC), and high-income (HIC) countries. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 2 | 50% |
| United States | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 1 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 146 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 3% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 141 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 28 | 19% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 20 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 19 | 13% |
| Other | 12 | 8% |
| Professor | 7 | 5% |
| Other | 28 | 19% |
| Unknown | 32 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 62 | 42% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 11 | 8% |
| Social Sciences | 10 | 7% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 6 | 4% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 3% |
| Other | 16 | 11% |
| Unknown | 37 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 21. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 August 2021.
All research outputs
#1,775,883
of 25,411,814 outputs
Outputs from JAIDS: Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes
#163
of 4,809 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,619
of 319,406 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JAIDS: Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes
#3
of 61 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,411,814 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,809 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 319,406 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 61 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.