↓ Skip to main content

Metacognitions in Problem Gambling

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Gambling Studies, April 2010
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Readers on

mendeley
83 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Metacognitions in Problem Gambling
Published in
Journal of Gambling Studies, April 2010
DOI 10.1007/s10899-010-9193-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Annika Lindberg, Bruce A. Fernie, Marcantonio M. Spada

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 83 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Italy 1 1%
Norway 1 1%
Unknown 81 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 22 27%
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 20%
Student > Master 13 16%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 8%
Other 3 4%
Other 10 12%
Unknown 11 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 40 48%
Social Sciences 10 12%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 6%
Engineering 3 4%
Neuroscience 2 2%
Other 6 7%
Unknown 17 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 March 2012.
All research outputs
#8,535,472
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Gambling Studies
#397
of 989 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38,463
of 104,811 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Gambling Studies
#5
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 989 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.4. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 104,811 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.