You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Economic analysis comparing induction of labour and expectant management for intrauterine growth restriction at term (DIGITAT trial)
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology & Reproductive Biology, August 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2013.07.017 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Sylvia M.C. Vijgen, Kim E. Boers, Brent C. Opmeer, Denise Bijlenga, Dick J. Bekedam, Kitty W.M. Bloemenkamp, Karin de Boer, Henk A. Bremer, Saskia le Cessie, Friso M.C. Delemarre, Johannes J. Duvekot, Tom H.M. Hasaart, Anneke Kwee, Jan M.M. van Lith, Claudia A. van Meir, Maria G. van Pampus, Joris A.M. van der Post, Monique Rijken, Frans J.M.E. Roumen, Paulien C.M. van der Salm, Marc E.A. Spaanderman, Christine Willekes, Ella J. Wijnen, Ben W.J. Mol, Sicco A. Scherjon |
| Abstract |
Pregnancies complicated by intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR) are at increased risk for neonatal morbidity and mortality. The Dutch nationwide disproportionate intrauterine growth intervention trial at term (DIGITAT trial) showed that induction of labour and expectant monitoring were comparable with respect to composite adverse neonatal outcome and operative delivery. In this study we compare the costs of both strategies. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| France | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 83 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 1 | 1% |
| Peru | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 81 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 17 | 20% |
| Researcher | 16 | 19% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 7 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 8% |
| Other | 6 | 7% |
| Other | 16 | 19% |
| Unknown | 14 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 43 | 52% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 7% |
| Social Sciences | 5 | 6% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 2 | 2% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 4 | 5% |
| Unknown | 22 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 December 2020.
All research outputs
#8,262,193
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology & Reproductive Biology
#1,043
of 3,999 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#66,751
of 214,310 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology & Reproductive Biology
#11
of 54 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,999 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 214,310 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 54 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.