You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Antifibrinolytics (lysine analogues) for the prevention of bleeding in patients with haematological disorders.
|
---|---|
Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 1996
|
DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd009733.pub2 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Douglas Wardrop, Lise J Estcourt, Susan J Brunskill, Carolyn Doree, Marialena Trivella, Simon Stanworth, Michael F Murphy, Lise J Estcourt |
Abstract |
Patients with haematological disorders are frequently at risk of severe or life-threatening bleeding as a result of thrombocytopenia. This is despite the routine use of prophylactic platelet transfusions (PlTx) to prevent bleeding once the platelet count falls below a certain threshold. PlTx are not without risk and adverse events may be life-threatening. A possible adjunct to prophylactic PlTxs is the use of antifibrinolytics, specifically the lysine analogues tranexamic acid (TXA) and epsilon aminocaproic acid (EACA). |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 63 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | 2% |
Egypt | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 61 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 10 | 16% |
Other | 6 | 10% |
Researcher | 6 | 10% |
Student > Postgraduate | 6 | 10% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 6% |
Other | 14 | 22% |
Unknown | 17 | 27% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 32 | 51% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 8% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 5% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 3% |
Psychology | 2 | 3% |
Other | 2 | 3% |
Unknown | 17 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 July 2013.
All research outputs
#20,196,821
of 22,715,151 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#11,990
of 12,313 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#29,442
of 29,966 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#119
of 124 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,715,151 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,313 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.3. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 29,966 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 124 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.