↓ Skip to main content

Processing DNA molecules as text

Overview of attention for article published in Systems and Synthetic Biology, June 2010
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
16 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
38 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
connotea
1 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Processing DNA molecules as text
Published in
Systems and Synthetic Biology, June 2010
DOI 10.1007/s11693-010-9059-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Uri Shabi, Shai Kaplan, Gregory Linshiz, Tuval BenYehezkel, Hen Buaron, Yair Mazor, Ehud Shapiro

Abstract

Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) is the DNA-equivalent of Gutenberg's movable type printing, both allowing large-scale replication of a piece of text. De novo DNA synthesis is the DNA-equivalent of mechanical typesetting, both ease the setting of text for replication. What is the DNA-equivalent of the word processor? Biology labs engage daily in DNA processing-the creation of variations and combinations of existing DNA-using a plethora of manual labor-intensive methods such as site-directed mutagenesis, error-prone PCR, assembly PCR, overlap extension PCR, cleavage and ligation, homologous recombination, and others. So far no universal method for DNA processing has been proposed and, consequently, no engineering discipline that could eliminate this manual labor has emerged. Here we present a novel operation on DNA molecules, called Y, which joins two DNA fragments into one, and show that it provides a foundation for DNA processing as it can implement all basic text processing operations on DNA molecules including insert, delete, replace, cut and paste and copy and paste. In addition, complicated DNA processing tasks such as the creation of libraries of DNA variants, chimeras and extensions can be accomplished with DNA processing plans consisting of multiple Y operations, which can be executed automatically under computer control. The resulting DNA processing system, which incorporates our earlier work on recursive DNA composition and error correction, is the first demonstration of a unified approach to DNA synthesis, editing, and library construction.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 38 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
France 1 3%
Honduras 1 3%
Israel 1 3%
United Kingdom 1 3%
Spain 1 3%
Unknown 33 87%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 12 32%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 18%
Student > Master 5 13%
Student > Bachelor 3 8%
Other 3 8%
Other 5 13%
Unknown 3 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 17 45%
Computer Science 8 21%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 13%
Engineering 2 5%
Chemical Engineering 1 3%
Other 3 8%
Unknown 2 5%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 May 2015.
All research outputs
#7,429,810
of 22,715,151 outputs
Outputs from Systems and Synthetic Biology
#38
of 97 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,915
of 95,455 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Systems and Synthetic Biology
#3
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,715,151 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 97 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 95,455 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.