You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Cervical pessaries for prevention of preterm birth in women with a multiple pregnancy (ProTWIN): a multicentre, open-label randomised controlled trial
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
The Lancet, August 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1016/s0140-6736(13)61408-7 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Sophie Liem, Ewoud Schuit, Maud Hegeman, Joke Bais, Karin de Boer, Kitty Bloemenkamp, Jozien Brons, Hans Duvekot, Bas Nij Bijvank, Maureen Franssen, Ingrid Gaugler, Irene de Graaf, Martijn Oudijk, Dimitri Papatsonis, Paula Pernet, Martina Porath, Liesbeth Scheepers, Marko Sikkema, Jan Sporken, Harry Visser, Wim van Wijngaarden, Mallory Woiski, Mariëlle van Pampus, Ben Willem Mol, Dick Bekedam |
| Abstract |
In women with a multiple pregnancy, spontaneous preterm delivery is the leading cause of perinatal morbidity and mortality. Interventions to reduce preterm birth in these women have not been successful. We assessed whether a cervical pessary could effectively prevent poor perinatal outcomes. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 13% |
| Argentina | 1 | 13% |
| Italy | 1 | 13% |
| Chile | 1 | 13% |
| Unknown | 4 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 7 | 88% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 13% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 201 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 3 | 1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Chile | 1 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Peru | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 193 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 29 | 14% |
| Researcher | 25 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 23 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 17 | 8% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 13 | 6% |
| Other | 50 | 25% |
| Unknown | 44 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 112 | 56% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 10 | 5% |
| Psychology | 8 | 4% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 3% |
| Engineering | 5 | 2% |
| Other | 9 | 4% |
| Unknown | 51 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 September 2019.
All research outputs
#2,063,202
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from The Lancet
#12,748
of 42,665 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,235
of 209,101 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Lancet
#154
of 464 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 42,665 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 67.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 209,101 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 464 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.