↓ Skip to main content

Extracting cellular automaton rules from physical Langevin equation models for single and collective cell migration

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Mathematical Biology, February 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (68th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (81st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Readers on

mendeley
26 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Extracting cellular automaton rules from physical Langevin equation models for single and collective cell migration
Published in
Journal of Mathematical Biology, February 2017
DOI 10.1007/s00285-017-1106-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

J. M. Nava-Sedeño, H. Hatzikirou, F. Peruani, A. Deutsch

Abstract

Cellular automata (CA) are discrete time, space, and state models which are extensively used for modeling biological phenomena. CA are "on-lattice" models with low computational demands. In particular, lattice-gas cellular automata (LGCA) have been introduced as models of single and collective cell migration. The interaction rule dictates the behavior of a cellular automaton model and is critical to the model's biological relevance. The LGCA model's interaction rule has been typically chosen phenomenologically. In this paper, we introduce a method to obtain lattice-gas cellular automaton interaction rules from physically-motivated "off-lattice" Langevin equation models for migrating cells. In particular, we consider Langevin equations related to single cell movement (movement of cells independent of each other) and collective cell migration (movement influenced by cell-cell interactions). As examples of collective cell migration, two different alignment mechanisms are studied: polar and nematic alignment. Both kinds of alignment have been observed in biological systems such as swarms of amoebae and myxobacteria. Polar alignment causes cells to align their velocities parallel to each other, whereas nematic alignment drives cells to align either parallel or antiparallel to each other. Under appropriate assumptions, we have derived the LGCA transition probability rule from the steady-state distribution of the off-lattice Fokker-Planck equation. Comparing alignment order parameters between the original Langevin model and the derived LGCA for both mechanisms, we found different areas of agreement in the parameter space. Finally, we discuss potential reasons for model disagreement and propose extensions to the CA rule derivation methodology.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 26 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 26 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 23%
Researcher 6 23%
Student > Master 3 12%
Student > Bachelor 2 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 8%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 6 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 15%
Mathematics 4 15%
Physics and Astronomy 4 15%
Engineering 3 12%
Computer Science 1 4%
Other 3 12%
Unknown 7 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 July 2021.
All research outputs
#6,054,895
of 22,992,311 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Mathematical Biology
#113
of 662 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#98,592
of 312,037 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Mathematical Biology
#4
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,992,311 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 662 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 312,037 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.