↓ Skip to main content

Association of NAT2 and smoking in relation to breast cancer incidence in a population-based case–control study (United States)

Overview of attention for article published in Cancer Causes & Control, February 2003
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Readers on

mendeley
3 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Association of NAT2 and smoking in relation to breast cancer incidence in a population-based case–control study (United States)
Published in
Cancer Causes & Control, February 2003
DOI 10.1023/a:1022517506689
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kathleen M. Egan, Polly A. Newcomb, Linda Titus-Ernstoff, Amy Trentham-Dietz, Laura I. Mignone, Frederico Farin, David J. Hunter

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 3 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 3 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor > Associate Professor 2 67%
Student > Master 1 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 33%
Sports and Recreations 1 33%
Unknown 1 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2014.
All research outputs
#8,535,472
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Cancer Causes & Control
#996
of 2,266 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#34,234
of 140,949 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cancer Causes & Control
#5
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,266 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.4. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 140,949 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.