↓ Skip to main content

A Retrospective Cross-Sectional and Longitudinal Study of the Effects of Age on CNS Vital Signs Scores in High-School Athletes

Overview of attention for article published in Sports Medicine, February 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (84th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
6 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
43 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A Retrospective Cross-Sectional and Longitudinal Study of the Effects of Age on CNS Vital Signs Scores in High-School Athletes
Published in
Sports Medicine, February 2017
DOI 10.1007/s40279-017-0686-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sharon D. Rogers, Patrick J. Smith, Alexandra J. Stephenson, D. Erik Everhart

Abstract

Current recommendations for concussion management acknowledge the importance of objective assessments of neuropsychological (NP) ability, and computerized NP assessments have been widely integrated into the concussion management protocols of high schools. The optimal intervals for baseline test administration in high-school athletes are currently uncertain. The ability to accurately detect subtle NP deficits is particularly important for high-school athletes, in which concussions are increasingly recognized for adverse effects to the developing brain. The aim of this study was to assess the pattern of change in neurocognitive test performance, as well as changes in different domains of NP functioning over time. Baseline computerized NP assessments were conducted at six high schools over 4 academic years using CNS Vital Signs, a battery consisting of seven well-established NP tests. Data were retrospectively examined for age differences in both cross-sectional (n = 3015) and longitudinal (n = 1221) analyses. Moderate changes were observed across several NP domains over time (Cohen's d = 0.39-0.61), with the largest improvements observed in executive functioning (mean improvement 5.78, 95% confidence interval [CI] 5.41-6.14, p < 0.001), psychomotor speed (mean improvement 4.59, 95% CI 3.97-5.22, p < 0.001), cognitive flexibility (mean improvement 5.11, 95% CI 4.76-5.45, p < 0.001), and reaction time (mean improvement -12.44 ms, 95% CI -10.10 to -14.78, p < 0.001). Improvements in NP performance were most pronounced between the freshman and senior years. There is an appreciable change that occurs each year of high school in one or more domains of an NP battery, with executive functioning indicating the greatest magnitude of change. Females performed better relative to males across all time points though males exhibited more substantial improvement over time.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 43 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 2%
Unknown 42 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 6 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 12%
Other 4 9%
Researcher 4 9%
Other 8 19%
Unknown 11 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 11 26%
Psychology 5 12%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 5%
Social Sciences 2 5%
Other 5 12%
Unknown 15 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 October 2019.
All research outputs
#2,391,609
of 22,957,478 outputs
Outputs from Sports Medicine
#1,460
of 2,710 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#47,882
of 311,652 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Sports Medicine
#38
of 51 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,957,478 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,710 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 51.2. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 311,652 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 51 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.