You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Patients' preferences when comparing analogue implant impressions using a polyether impression material versus digital impressions (Intraoral Scan) of dental implants
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Clinical Oral Implants Research, August 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1111/clr.12234 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Daniel Wismeijer, Ronny Mans, Michiel van Genuchten, Hajo A. Reijers |
| Abstract |
The primary objective of this clinical study was to assess the patients' perception of the difference between an analogue impression approach on the one hand and an intra-oral scan (IO scan) on the other when restoring implants in the non-aesthetic zone. A second objective was to analyse the difference in time needed to perform these two procedures. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Latvia | 1 | 50% |
| India | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 1 | 50% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 208 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 206 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 42 | 20% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 27 | 13% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 19 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 19 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 14 | 7% |
| Other | 28 | 13% |
| Unknown | 59 | 28% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 112 | 54% |
| Engineering | 5 | 2% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 2% |
| Social Sciences | 4 | 2% |
| Psychology | 3 | 1% |
| Other | 10 | 5% |
| Unknown | 70 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 August 2013.
All research outputs
#16,699,002
of 24,558,777 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Oral Implants Research
#669
of 1,222 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#125,856
of 201,705 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Oral Implants Research
#3
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,558,777 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,222 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.8. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 201,705 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.