↓ Skip to main content

Closing the gap between T-cell life span estimates from stable isotope-labeling studies in mice and humans

Overview of attention for article published in Blood, August 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
110 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
146 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Closing the gap between T-cell life span estimates from stable isotope-labeling studies in mice and humans
Published in
Blood, August 2013
DOI 10.1182/blood-2013-03-488411
Pubmed ID
Authors

Liset Westera, Julia Drylewicz, Ineke den Braber, Tendai Mugwagwa, Iris van der Maas, Lydia Kwast, Thomas Volman, Elise H.R. van de Weg-Schrijver, István Bartha, Gerrit Spierenburg, Koos Gaiser, Mariëtte T. Ackermans, Becca Asquith, Rob J. de Boer, Kiki Tesselaar, José A.M. Borghans

Abstract

Quantitative knowledge of the turnover of different leukocyte populations is a key to our understanding of immune function in health and disease. Much progress has been made thanks to the introduction of stable isotope labeling, the state-of-the-art technique for in vivo quantification of cellular life spans. Yet, even leukocyte life span estimates on the basis of stable isotope labeling can vary up to 10-fold among laboratories. We investigated whether these differences could be the result of variances in the length of the labeling period among studies. To this end, we performed deuterated water-labeling experiments in mice, in which only the length of label administration was varied. The resulting life span estimates were indeed dependent on the length of the labeling period when the data were analyzed using a commonly used single-exponential model. We show that multiexponential models provide the necessary tool to obtain life span estimates that are independent of the length of the labeling period. Use of a multiexponential model enabled us to reduce the gap between human T-cell life span estimates from 2 previously published labeling studies. This provides an important step toward unambiguous understanding of leukocyte turnover in health and disease.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 146 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 2%
Hungary 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Unknown 141 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 40 27%
Student > Ph. D. Student 31 21%
Student > Bachelor 16 11%
Student > Master 12 8%
Other 7 5%
Other 15 10%
Unknown 25 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 33 23%
Immunology and Microbiology 23 16%
Medicine and Dentistry 21 14%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 12 8%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 6 4%
Other 21 14%
Unknown 30 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 September 2017.
All research outputs
#17,285,036
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Blood
#27,622
of 33,239 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#131,031
of 207,919 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Blood
#178
of 261 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 33,239 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 207,919 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 261 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.