You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Title |
Oxygen therapy for acute myocardial infarction
|
---|---|
Published by |
John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, August 2013
|
DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd007160.pub3 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Cabello, Juan B, Burls, Amanda, Emparanza, José I, Bayliss, Susan, Quinn, Tom |
Abstract |
Oxygen (O₂) is widely used in people with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) although it has been suggested it may do more harm than good. Previous systematic reviews have concluded that there was insufficient evidence to know whether oxygen reduced, increased or had no effect on heart ischaemia or infarct size, as did our original Cochrane review on this topic in 2010. The wide dissemination of the lack of evidence to support this widely-used intervention since 2010 may stimulate the needed trials of oxygen therapy, and it is therefore important that this review is updated regularly. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 28 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 8 | 29% |
Canada | 2 | 7% |
Australia | 2 | 7% |
Chile | 1 | 4% |
Central African Republic | 1 | 4% |
Denmark | 1 | 4% |
New Zealand | 1 | 4% |
Djibouti | 1 | 4% |
Unknown | 11 | 39% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 23 | 82% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 11% |
Scientists | 2 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 160 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 2 | 1% |
Australia | 1 | <1% |
Austria | 1 | <1% |
Egypt | 1 | <1% |
Canada | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 154 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 19 | 12% |
Researcher | 15 | 9% |
Student > Bachelor | 15 | 9% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 8% |
Student > Postgraduate | 10 | 6% |
Other | 28 | 18% |
Unknown | 60 | 38% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 62 | 39% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 15 | 9% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 3% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 4 | 3% |
Psychology | 2 | 1% |
Other | 7 | 4% |
Unknown | 65 | 41% |