↓ Skip to main content

A quality improvement initiative to reduce central line infection in neonates using checklists

Overview of attention for article published in European Journal of Pediatrics, March 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (52nd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (55th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users

Readers on

mendeley
102 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A quality improvement initiative to reduce central line infection in neonates using checklists
Published in
European Journal of Pediatrics, March 2017
DOI 10.1007/s00431-017-2888-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jacqueline E. Taylor, Susan J. McDonald, Arul Earnest, Jim Buttery, Bree Fusinato, Samantha Hovenden, Andrea Wallace, Kenneth Tan

Abstract

Central line associated blood stream infections (CLABSI) are the most common complication of central catheters in neonates. These infections increase length of hospital stay, hospital costs and impact on mortality and morbidities. We performed a quasi-experimental study, over 24 months, utilising a pre-post design to determine the impact checklists had on central line infections. We introduced checklists for insertion, daily maintenance and procedural access based on the existing clinical guideline. Infections and compliance were monitored and reported back to the unit each month. We utilised the interrupted time series analysis to evaluate the impact of introduction of the checklists. Over the 24 months, 318 infants were included with a total of 509 central lines inserted. In the post intervention phase, definite CLABSI rates declined by 41%, from 13.8 definite CLABSIs per 1000 central-line days to 7.8 definite CLABSIs per 1000 central-line days. There was significant change in the mean levels in the post intervention phase (coefficient crude -0.01015; 95% CI -0.01980-0.00051, p value 0.039). Checklist compliance for insertion was 70%, and daily maintenance compliance overall mean was 66%. Our quality improvement initiative using checklists, supported with education and feedback, significantly reduced CLABSI in our neonatal unit. What is Known: • Central line associated blood stream infection (CLABSI) continue to cause mortality and morbidity in the neonatal population. • Bundles of intervention use quality improvement methodology to reduce CLABSI and checklists can assist with the introduction of these. What is New: • Checklists assist with reducing central line infection. • To ensure the success of checklists, robust education, leadership and continuous feedback are vital.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 102 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 102 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 31 30%
Other 9 9%
Student > Master 9 9%
Unspecified 6 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 4%
Other 18 18%
Unknown 25 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 38 37%
Medicine and Dentistry 22 22%
Unspecified 6 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 <1%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 <1%
Other 4 4%
Unknown 30 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 May 2017.
All research outputs
#12,927,204
of 23,306,612 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Pediatrics
#2,211
of 3,835 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#146,049
of 308,620 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Pediatrics
#25
of 54 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,306,612 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,835 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.7. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 308,620 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 54 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.