You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Dynamic cooperation and competition between brain systems during cognitive control
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Trends in Cognitive Sciences, September 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.tics.2013.08.006 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Luca Cocchi, Andrew Zalesky, Alex Fornito, Jason B. Mattingley |
| Abstract |
The human brain is characterized by a remarkable ability to adapt its information processing based on current goals. This ability, which is encompassed by the psychological construct of cognitive control, involves activity throughout large-scale, specialized brain systems that support segregated functions at rest and during active task performance. Based on recent research, we propose an account in which control functions rely on transitory changes in patterns of cooperation and competition between neural systems. This account challenges current conceptualizations of control as relying on segregated or antagonistic activity of specialized brain systems. Accordingly, we argue that the study of transitory task-based interactions between brain systems is critical to understanding the flexibility of normal cognitive control and its disruption in pathological conditions. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 18 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 17% |
| Australia | 3 | 17% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 11% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 9 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 12 | 67% |
| Scientists | 4 | 22% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 6% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 587 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 9 | 2% |
| Spain | 3 | <1% |
| Japan | 3 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 2 | <1% |
| Australia | 2 | <1% |
| France | 2 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
| Brazil | 2 | <1% |
| Sweden | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 7 | 1% |
| Unknown | 554 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 141 | 24% |
| Researcher | 114 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 65 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 49 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 34 | 6% |
| Other | 101 | 17% |
| Unknown | 83 | 14% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 222 | 38% |
| Neuroscience | 98 | 17% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 46 | 8% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 24 | 4% |
| Engineering | 16 | 3% |
| Other | 63 | 11% |
| Unknown | 118 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 June 2016.
All research outputs
#2,716,692
of 25,443,857 outputs
Outputs from Trends in Cognitive Sciences
#1,227
of 2,298 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,137
of 210,220 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Trends in Cognitive Sciences
#12
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,443,857 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,298 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 42.8. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 210,220 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.