↓ Skip to main content

Can Genetics Help Psychometrics? Improving Dimensionality Assessment Through Genetic Factor Modeling

Overview of attention for article published in Psychological Methods, September 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
peer_reviews
1 peer review site
reddit
1 Redditor

Citations

dimensions_citation
40 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
58 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Can Genetics Help Psychometrics? Improving Dimensionality Assessment Through Genetic Factor Modeling
Published in
Psychological Methods, September 2013
DOI 10.1037/a0032755
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sanja Franić, Conor V. Dolan, Denny Borsboom, James J. Hudziak, Catherina E. M. van Beijsterveldt, Dorret I. Boomsma

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 58 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 2%
Unknown 57 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 31%
Student > Master 7 12%
Researcher 6 10%
Professor 4 7%
Student > Bachelor 3 5%
Other 8 14%
Unknown 12 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 34 59%
Social Sciences 4 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 3%
Arts and Humanities 1 2%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 2%
Other 2 3%
Unknown 14 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 July 2023.
All research outputs
#15,422,295
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Psychological Methods
#464
of 737 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#119,196
of 215,492 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Psychological Methods
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 737 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.4. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 215,492 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.