↓ Skip to main content

Attitudes and stigma in relation to help-seeking intentions for psychological problems in low and high suicide rate regions

Overview of attention for article published in Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, July 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
twitter
24 X users

Readers on

mendeley
264 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Attitudes and stigma in relation to help-seeking intentions for psychological problems in low and high suicide rate regions
Published in
Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, July 2013
DOI 10.1007/s00127-013-0745-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

A. Reynders, A. J. F. M. Kerkhof, G. Molenberghs, C. Van Audenhove

Abstract

Accessibility and availability of mental health care services are necessary but not sufficient for people to seek help for psychological problems. Attitudes and stigma related to help seeking also determine help seeking intentions. The aim of this study is to investigate how cross-national differences in attitudes and stigma within the general population are related to professional and informal help seeking intentions in low and high suicide rate regions.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 24 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 264 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 1 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Puerto Rico 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 256 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 38 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 36 14%
Student > Bachelor 31 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 30 11%
Researcher 20 8%
Other 44 17%
Unknown 65 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 104 39%
Medicine and Dentistry 26 10%
Social Sciences 21 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 17 6%
Unspecified 4 2%
Other 13 5%
Unknown 79 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 34. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 August 2021.
All research outputs
#1,069,280
of 23,794,258 outputs
Outputs from Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology
#184
of 2,534 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,324
of 200,248 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology
#1
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,794,258 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,534 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 200,248 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.