↓ Skip to main content

Pilfering ravens, Corvus corax, adjust their behaviour to social context and identity of competitors

Overview of attention for article published in Animal Cognition, August 2006
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
97 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
191 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Pilfering ravens, Corvus corax, adjust their behaviour to social context and identity of competitors
Published in
Animal Cognition, August 2006
DOI 10.1007/s10071-006-0035-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Thomas Bugnyar, Bernd Heinrich

Abstract

Like other corvids, food-storing ravens protect their caches from being pilfered by conspecifics by means of aggression and by re-caching. In the wild and in captivity, potential pilferers rarely approach caches until the storers have left the cache vicinity. When storers are experimentally prevented from leaving, pilferers first search at places other than the cache sites. These behaviours raise the possibility that ravens are capable of withholding intentions and providing false information to avoid provoking the storers' aggression for cache protection. Alternatively, birds may refrain from pilfering to avoid conflicts with dominants. Here we examined whether ravens adjust their pilfer tactics according to social context and type of competitors. We allowed birds that had witnessed a conspecific making caches to pilfer those caches either in private, together with the storer, or together with a conspecific bystander that had not created the caches (non-storer) but had seen them being made. Compared to in-private trials, ravens delayed approaching the caches only in the presence of storers. Furthermore, they quickly engaged in searching away from the caches when together with dominant storers but directly approached the caches when together with dominant non-storers. These findings demonstrate that ravens selectively alter their pilfer behaviour with those individuals that are likely to defend the caches (storers) and support the interpretation that they are deceptively manipulating the others' behaviour.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 191 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 2%
Canada 3 2%
United Kingdom 3 2%
Austria 2 1%
Germany 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Unknown 175 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 40 21%
Student > Master 35 18%
Student > Bachelor 32 17%
Researcher 23 12%
Other 8 4%
Other 27 14%
Unknown 26 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 97 51%
Psychology 31 16%
Environmental Science 12 6%
Philosophy 4 2%
Arts and Humanities 4 2%
Other 10 5%
Unknown 33 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 June 2016.
All research outputs
#1,681,363
of 22,721,584 outputs
Outputs from Animal Cognition
#392
of 1,442 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,019
of 66,019 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Animal Cognition
#3
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,721,584 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,442 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 66,019 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.