↓ Skip to main content

Guidance for diagnosis and treatment of acute angioedema in the emergency department: consensus statement by a panel of Italian experts

Overview of attention for article published in Internal and Emergency Medicine, September 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (74th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog

Readers on

mendeley
57 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Guidance for diagnosis and treatment of acute angioedema in the emergency department: consensus statement by a panel of Italian experts
Published in
Internal and Emergency Medicine, September 2013
DOI 10.1007/s11739-013-0993-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Marco Cicardi, Paolo Bellis, Giuliano Bertazzoni, Mauro Cancian, Maurizio Chiesa, Paolo Cremonesi, Pietro Marino, Nicola Montano, Claudia Morselli, Francesco Ottaviani, Roberto Perricone, Massimo Triggiani, Andrea Zanichelli

Abstract

Angioedema attacks, characterized by the transient swelling of the skin and mucosae, are a frequent cause of visits to the emergency department. Swellings of the oral cavity, tongue, or larynx can result in life-threatening airway obstruction, while abdominal attacks can cause severe pain and often lead to unnecessary surgery. The underlying pathophysiologic process resulting in increased vascular permeability and plasma extravasation is mediated by vasoactive molecules, most commonly histamine and bradykinin. Based on the mediator involved, distinct angioedema forms can be recognized, calling for distinct therapeutic approaches. Prompt recognition is challenging for the emergency physician. The low awareness among physicians of the existence of rare forms of angioedema with different aetiologies and pathogenesis, considerably adds to the problem. Also poorly appreciated by emergency personnel may be the recently introduced bradykinin-targeted treatments. The main objective of this consensus statement is to provide guidance for the management of acute angioedema in the emergency department, from presentation to discharge or hospital admission, with a focus on identifying patients in whom new treatments may prevent invasive intervention.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 57 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 2%
South Africa 1 2%
Unknown 55 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 7 12%
Other 6 11%
Student > Bachelor 5 9%
Lecturer 4 7%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 7%
Other 16 28%
Unknown 15 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 23 40%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 7%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 4%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 4%
Other 5 9%
Unknown 19 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 April 2014.
All research outputs
#5,863,618
of 22,723,682 outputs
Outputs from Internal and Emergency Medicine
#278
of 931 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#49,910
of 196,878 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Internal and Emergency Medicine
#5
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,723,682 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 931 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 196,878 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.