↓ Skip to main content

The cost-effectiveness of a family meetings intervention to prevent depression and anxiety in family caregivers of patients with dementia: a randomized trial

Overview of attention for article published in Trials, September 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
28 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
242 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The cost-effectiveness of a family meetings intervention to prevent depression and anxiety in family caregivers of patients with dementia: a randomized trial
Published in
Trials, September 2013
DOI 10.1186/1745-6215-14-305
Pubmed ID
Authors

Karlijn J Joling, Judith E Bosmans, Harm W J van Marwijk, Henriëtte E van der Horst, Philip Scheltens, Janet L MacNeil Vroomen, Hein P J van Hout

Abstract

Dementia imposes a heavy burden on health and social care systems as well as on family caregivers who provide a substantial portion of the care. Interventions that effectively support caregivers may prevent or delay patient institutionalization and hence be cost-effective. However, evidence about the cost-effectiveness of such interventions is scarce. The aim of this study was to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of a family meetings intervention for family caregivers of dementia patients in comparison with usual care over a period of 12 months.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 242 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 3 1%
India 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Unknown 237 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 41 17%
Student > Master 39 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 28 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 20 8%
Student > Bachelor 16 7%
Other 39 16%
Unknown 59 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 40 17%
Psychology 39 16%
Nursing and Health Professions 37 15%
Social Sciences 22 9%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 11 5%
Other 30 12%
Unknown 63 26%