You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Intestinal parasitic infections in homosexual men: prevalence, symptoms and factors in transmission.
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Canadian Medical Association Journal, September 1980
|
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
J S Keystone, D L Keystone, E M Proctor |
| Abstract |
In a controlled study 67.5% of 200 homosexual men but only 16% of 100 heterosexual men were found to be infected with intestinal parasites. Entamoeba histolytica was isolated from 27% of the homosexual and 1% of the heterosexual men, and Giardia lamblia was isolated from 13% of the homosexual and 3% of the heterosexual men. The presence of symptoms could not be correlated with infection except when the infection was caused by more than one organism, including G. lamblia. Symptoms were much more common in both infected and uninfected homosexuals than in heterosexuals. Among the homosexual men recent foreign travel, living in a homosexual household and promiscuity were not correlated with intestinal parasitic infection, but cleansing of the anus before and sex was associated with a significantly lower prevalence of infection. These findings suggest that the male homosexual community may be an important reservoir of potentially pathogenic protozoa. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 370 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 56 | 15% |
| Greece | 9 | 2% |
| Canada | 5 | 1% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | <1% |
| Georgia | 2 | <1% |
| Colombia | 2 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| United Arab Emirates | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 18 | 5% |
| Unknown | 272 | 74% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 360 | 97% |
| Scientists | 5 | 1% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | <1% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 51 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 50 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 4 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 4% |
| Professor | 2 | 4% |
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 2% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 5 | 10% |
| Unknown | 36 | 71% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 6% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 3 | 6% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 4% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 2 | 4% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 4 | 8% |
| Unknown | 35 | 69% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 330. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 May 2024.
All research outputs
#103,393
of 25,844,183 outputs
Outputs from Canadian Medical Association Journal
#191
of 9,562 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6
of 6,429 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Canadian Medical Association Journal
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,844,183 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,562 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 34.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 6,429 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them