You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
From biomarkers to medical tests: The changing landscape of test evaluation
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Clinica Chimica Acta, September 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.cca.2013.09.018 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Andrea R. Horvath, Sarah J. Lord, Andrew StJohn, Sverre Sandberg, Christa M. Cobbaert, Stefan Lorenz, Phillip J. Monaghan, Wilma D.J. Verhagen-Kamerbeek, Christoph Ebert, Patrick M.M. Bossuyt, For the Test Evaluation Working Group of the European Federation of Clinical Chemistry Laboratory Medicine |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 33% |
| Spain | 1 | 33% |
| Australia | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 33% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 33% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 193 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 1% |
| Australia | 2 | 1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 186 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 40 | 21% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 27 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 27 | 14% |
| Other | 14 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 12 | 6% |
| Other | 39 | 20% |
| Unknown | 34 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 74 | 38% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 18 | 9% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 16 | 8% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 9 | 5% |
| Computer Science | 6 | 3% |
| Other | 32 | 17% |
| Unknown | 38 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 April 2024.
All research outputs
#15,425,404
of 25,761,363 outputs
Outputs from Clinica Chimica Acta
#2,859
of 4,874 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#118,289
of 217,550 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinica Chimica Acta
#13
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,761,363 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,874 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 217,550 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.