You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Induced Hypothermia in Severe Bacterial Meningitis: A Randomized Clinical Trial
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association, November 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1001/jama.2013.280506 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Bruno Mourvillier, Florence Tubach, Diederik van de Beek, Denis Garot, Nicolas Pichon, Hugues Georges, Laurent Martin Lefevre, Pierre-Edouard Bollaert, Thierry Boulain, David Luis, Alain Cariou, Patrick Girardie, Riad Chelha, Bruno Megarbane, Arnaud Delahaye, Ludivine Chalumeau-Lemoine, Stéphane Legriel, Pascal Beuret, François Brivet, Cédric Bruel, Fabrice Camou, Delphine Chatellier, Patrick Chillet, Bernard Clair, Jean-Michel Constantin, Alexandre Duguet, Richard Galliot, Frédérique Bayle, Hervé Hyvernat, Kader Ouchenir, Gaetan Plantefeve, Jean-Pierre Quenot, Jack Richecoeur, Carole Schwebel, Michel Sirodot, Marina Esposito-Farèse, Yves Le Tulzo, Michel Wolff |
| Abstract |
Despite advances in care, mortality and morbidity remain high in adults with acute bacterial meningitis, particularly when due to Streptococcus pneumoniae. Induced hypothermia is beneficial in other conditions with global cerebral hypoxia. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 76 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 11 | 14% |
| United Kingdom | 7 | 9% |
| Italy | 5 | 7% |
| France | 3 | 4% |
| Canada | 3 | 4% |
| Spain | 3 | 4% |
| Thailand | 2 | 3% |
| New Zealand | 2 | 3% |
| Kuwait | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 6 | 8% |
| Unknown | 33 | 43% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 49 | 64% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 15 | 20% |
| Scientists | 8 | 11% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 4 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 244 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Denmark | 1 | <1% |
| Japan | 1 | <1% |
| Greece | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 237 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 45 | 18% |
| Other | 27 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 23 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 23 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 20 | 8% |
| Other | 67 | 27% |
| Unknown | 39 | 16% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 136 | 56% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 13 | 5% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 12 | 5% |
| Neuroscience | 10 | 4% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 7 | 3% |
| Other | 21 | 9% |
| Unknown | 45 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 89. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 June 2022.
All research outputs
#481,043
of 25,562,515 outputs
Outputs from JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association
#5,278
of 36,606 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,509
of 320,861 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association
#61
of 320 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,562,515 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 36,606 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 72.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 320,861 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 320 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.