Foundations of Quantum Theory

@forlotto3 @TOEwithCurt Landsmann does a pretty good job of making neo-Copenhagen look OK: https://t.co/aryaUZmxff (Open Access book, but its mathematical level might not be accessible for everybody.)

🙄... I like to think that Bell, had his error been pointed out to him, would not have persisted in it and gone on to make further errors concerning the scope of the PBR theorem; the "nonlocality" of "the world" etc. https://t.co/5Jrc3z8iDk https://t.co/a

最近，ドイツのある研究者とやりとりしているんだが，彼が私の論文を読んでくれたのだから，私も彼の方を読むのが筋。彼の方は下の本に関わる研究。 だが，ちょー待てい，ページ数881! 目が飛び出たわ。 N.P. Landsman(2017), Foundations of Quantum Theory Open access: https://t.co/1YU2E1ctFU

@witty_physics I wouldn't regard BM as an interpretation of QM. Rather, it's an alternative to QM; a "hidden variable theory" or "classical model of QM" in Landsman's more apt terminology (https://t.co/5Jrc3z8iDk).