↓ Skip to main content

Clinical Relevance of Routinely Measured Vital Signs in Hospitalized Patients: A Systematic Review

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Nursing Scholarship, October 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
46 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
113 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Clinical Relevance of Routinely Measured Vital Signs in Hospitalized Patients: A Systematic Review
Published in
Journal of Nursing Scholarship, October 2013
DOI 10.1111/jnu.12048
Pubmed ID
Authors

Marja N. Storm‐Versloot, Lotte Verweij, Cees Lucas, Jeroen Ludikhuize, J. Carel Goslings, Dink A. Legemate, Hester Vermeulen

Abstract

Conflicting evidence exists on the effectiveness of routinely measured vital signs on the early detection of increased probability of adverse events.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 113 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 2 2%
United States 2 2%
South Africa 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Unknown 106 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 19 17%
Student > Master 15 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 11%
Researcher 9 8%
Student > Postgraduate 9 8%
Other 26 23%
Unknown 23 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 33 29%
Nursing and Health Professions 25 22%
Computer Science 10 9%
Engineering 5 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 4%
Other 12 11%
Unknown 23 20%