You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Cognitive Behavior Therapy for Pediatric Functional Abdominal Pain: A Randomized Controlled Trial
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Pediatrics, October 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1542/peds.2013-0242 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Shelley M.C. van der Veek, Bert H.F. Derkx, Marc A. Benninga, Frits Boer, Else de Haan |
| Abstract |
This randomized controlled trial investigated the effectiveness of a 6-session protocolized cognitive behavior therapy (CBT) compared with 6 visits to a pediatrician (intensive medical care; IMC) for the treatment of pediatric functional abdominal pain (FAP). |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 2 | 22% |
| New Zealand | 1 | 11% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 11% |
| Malaysia | 1 | 11% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 11% |
| Unknown | 3 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 8 | 89% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 11% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 216 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
| Spain | 2 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 210 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 34 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 30 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 21 | 10% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 20 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 20 | 9% |
| Other | 42 | 19% |
| Unknown | 49 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 65 | 30% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 51 | 24% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 14 | 6% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 3% |
| Social Sciences | 5 | 2% |
| Other | 15 | 7% |
| Unknown | 60 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 January 2014.
All research outputs
#2,352,180
of 23,848,132 outputs
Outputs from Pediatrics
#5,704
of 17,512 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,947
of 214,333 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Pediatrics
#98
of 214 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,848,132 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 17,512 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 47.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 214,333 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 214 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.