↓ Skip to main content

Collaborative meta-analysis finds no evidence of a strong interaction between stress and 5-HTTLPR genotype contributing to the development of depression

Overview of attention for article published in Molecular Psychiatry, April 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#30 of 4,680)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
14 news outlets
blogs
6 blogs
twitter
969 X users
facebook
10 Facebook pages
wikipedia
9 Wikipedia pages
reddit
1 Redditor

Citations

dimensions_citation
275 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
553 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Collaborative meta-analysis finds no evidence of a strong interaction between stress and 5-HTTLPR genotype contributing to the development of depression
Published in
Molecular Psychiatry, April 2017
DOI 10.1038/mp.2017.44
Pubmed ID
Authors

R C Culverhouse, N L Saccone, A C Horton, Y Ma, K J Anstey, T Banaschewski, M Burmeister, S Cohen-Woods, B Etain, H L Fisher, N Goldman, S Guillaume, J Horwood, G Juhasz, K J Lester, L Mandelli, C M Middeldorp, E Olié, S Villafuerte, T M Air, R Araya, L Bowes, R Burns, E M Byrne, C Coffey, W L Coventry, K A B Gawronski, D Glei, A Hatzimanolis, J-J Hottenga, I Jaussent, C Jawahar, C Jennen-Steinmetz, J R Kramer, M Lajnef, K Little, H M zu Schwabedissen, M Nauck, E Nederhof, P Petschner, W J Peyrot, C Schwahn, G Sinnamon, D Stacey, Y Tian, C Toben, S Van der Auwera, N Wainwright, J-C Wang, G Willemsen, I M Anderson, V Arolt, C Åslund, G Bagdy, B T Baune, F Bellivier, D I Boomsma, P Courtet, U Dannlowski, E J C de Geus, J F W Deakin, S Easteal, T Eley, D M Fergusson, A M Goate, X Gonda, H J Grabe, C Holzman, E O Johnson, M Kennedy, M Laucht, N G Martin, M R Munafò, K W Nilsson, A J Oldehinkel, C A Olsson, J Ormel, C Otte, G C Patton, B W J H Penninx, K Ritchie, M Sarchiapone, J M Scheid, A Serretti, J H Smit, N C Stefanis, P G Surtees, H Völzke, M Weinstein, M Whooley, J I Nurnberger Jr, N Breslau, L J Bierut

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 969 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 553 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Malaysia 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
China 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Unknown 547 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 77 14%
Student > Master 74 13%
Researcher 66 12%
Student > Bachelor 61 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 30 5%
Other 104 19%
Unknown 141 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 129 23%
Medicine and Dentistry 59 11%
Neuroscience 58 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 31 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 21 4%
Other 71 13%
Unknown 184 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 624. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 March 2024.
All research outputs
#36,523
of 25,832,559 outputs
Outputs from Molecular Psychiatry
#30
of 4,680 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#704
of 325,059 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Molecular Psychiatry
#2
of 95 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,832,559 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,680 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 39.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 325,059 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 95 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.