You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Estimates and 25-year trends of the global burden of disease attributable to ambient air pollution: an analysis of data from the Global Burden of Diseases Study 2015
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
The Lancet, April 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1016/s0140-6736(17)30505-6 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Aaron J Cohen, Michael Brauer, Richard Burnett, H Ross Anderson, Joseph Frostad, Kara Estep, Kalpana Balakrishnan, Bert Brunekreef, Lalit Dandona, Rakhi Dandona, Valery Feigin, Greg Freedman, Bryan Hubbell, Amelia Jobling, Haidong Kan, Luke Knibbs, Yang Liu, Randall Martin, Lidia Morawska, C Arden Pope, Hwashin Shin, Kurt Straif, Gavin Shaddick, Matthew Thomas, Rita van Dingenen, Aaron van Donkelaar, Theo Vos, Christopher J L Murray, Mohammad H Forouzanfar |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 670 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 97 | 14% |
| United Kingdom | 85 | 13% |
| Spain | 43 | 6% |
| Australia | 25 | 4% |
| Canada | 20 | 3% |
| France | 10 | 1% |
| India | 10 | 1% |
| Belgium | 8 | 1% |
| Italy | 8 | 1% |
| Other | 93 | 14% |
| Unknown | 271 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 476 | 71% |
| Scientists | 94 | 14% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 85 | 13% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 14 | 2% |
| Unknown | 1 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 3,689 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 3 | <1% |
| United States | 3 | <1% |
| Germany | 2 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
| Norway | 1 | <1% |
| Kenya | 1 | <1% |
| Malaysia | 1 | <1% |
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 2 | <1% |
| Unknown | 3672 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 529 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 494 | 13% |
| Researcher | 470 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 316 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 171 | 5% |
| Other | 570 | 15% |
| Unknown | 1139 | 31% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 559 | 15% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 370 | 10% |
| Engineering | 256 | 7% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 130 | 4% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 122 | 3% |
| Other | 886 | 24% |
| Unknown | 1366 | 37% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2237. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 April 2024.
All research outputs
#3,862
of 25,936,091 outputs
Outputs from The Lancet
#176
of 43,119 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#36
of 328,103 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Lancet
#3
of 478 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,936,091 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 43,119 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 68.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 328,103 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 478 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.