You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Erratum to: Chronic and Invasive Fungal Infections in a Family with CARD9 Deficiency
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Clinical Immunology, April 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10875-016-0283-4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ana Karina Alves de Medeiros, Evelyn Lodewick, Delfien J. A. Bogaert, Filomeen Haerynck, Sabine Van daele, Bart Lambrecht, Sara Bosma, Laure Vanderdonckt, Olivier Lortholary, Mélanie Migaud, Jean-Laurent Casanova, Anne Puel, Fanny Lanternier, Jo Lambert, Lieve Brochez, Melissa Dullaers |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 April 2016.
All research outputs
#20,413,129
of 22,963,381 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Clinical Immunology
#1,262
of 1,570 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#253,639
of 299,292 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Clinical Immunology
#36
of 40 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,963,381 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,570 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.4. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 299,292 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 40 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.