↓ Skip to main content

Clinical Impact of Stent Implantation for Coarctation of the Aorta with Associated Hypoplasia of the Transverse Aortic Arch

Overview of attention for article published in Pediatric Cardiology, April 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
13 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Clinical Impact of Stent Implantation for Coarctation of the Aorta with Associated Hypoplasia of the Transverse Aortic Arch
Published in
Pediatric Cardiology, April 2017
DOI 10.1007/s00246-017-1611-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

W. H. Lu, Chun-Po Steve Fan, Rajiv Chaturvedi, Kyong-Jin Lee, Cedric Manlhiot, Lee Benson

Abstract

The aim of this study was to explore the clinical impact of transverse aortic arch hypoplasia (TAH) after stent implementation for isthmal coarctation of the aorta (CoA). From a retrospective chart review, 51 children (median age 11.1 years) were identified who had TAH and a CoA stent implanted between 10/1995 and 4/2015. Arm-leg cuff blood pressure measurements, echocardiographic arch imaging, and 24-h ambulatory blood pressure monitoring, prior to and after stent implantation, were reviewed. At catheterization, peak systolic gradients across the CoA's were 25 mmHg before and 4 mmHg after stent implantation. At a median 37-month follow-up, echocardiographic imaging showed no significant catch-up growth in the transverse arch (median z-score; proximal and distal arch -1.54 and -1.99 vs. -1.78 and -1.63, p = 0.13 and 0.90). A trend to increasing systolic blood pressure (SBP) differentials between the right and left arms was noted (11 mmHg [prior to]; 16 mmHg [follow-up], p = 0.09). Age-adjusted percentiles for right arm SBP decreased from 99.7% prior to, and 87.6% in follow-up (p < 0.001). The median time to re-intervention was 5.6 years (95% CI [2.8, 7.8]) and the proportion of children using anti-hypertensive in follow-up was not significantly different before the implantation (38% [prior to]; 45% [follow-up]). Elevated right arm blood pressure persists after successful stent implantation in the setting of associated TAH and there appears to be no catch-up growth of the transverse arch with time. Medical management can be difficult and approaches to surgical arch augmentation or stent implantation should be considered to avoid unilateral arm hypertension.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 13 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 13 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 15%
Researcher 2 15%
Other 1 8%
Professor 1 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 8%
Other 2 15%
Unknown 4 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 5 38%
Decision Sciences 1 8%
Psychology 1 8%
Unknown 6 46%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 May 2017.
All research outputs
#18,541,268
of 22,963,381 outputs
Outputs from Pediatric Cardiology
#862
of 1,412 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#235,850
of 310,129 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Pediatric Cardiology
#11
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,963,381 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,412 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.7. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 310,129 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.