↓ Skip to main content

The SGIM TEACH Program: A Curriculum for Teachers of Clinical Medicine

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of General Internal Medicine, April 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
12 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
51 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The SGIM TEACH Program: A Curriculum for Teachers of Clinical Medicine
Published in
Journal of General Internal Medicine, April 2017
DOI 10.1007/s11606-017-4053-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Christopher L. Knight, Donna M. Windish, Steven A. Haist, Reena Karani, Shobhina Chheda, Michael Rosenblum, Preetha Basaviah, Abby L. Spencer, Eva M. Aagaard

Abstract

Demand for faculty with teaching expertise is increasing as medical education is becoming well established as a career pathway. Junior faculty may be expected to take on teaching responsibilities with minimal training in teaching skills. To address the faculty development needs of junior clinician-educators with teaching responsibilities and those changing their career focus to include teaching. Sessions at two Society of General Internal Medicine (SGIM) annual meetings combined with local coaching and online learning during the intervening year. Eighty-nine faculty scholars in four consecutive annual cohorts from 2013 to 2016. Scholars participate in a full-day core teaching course as well as selective workshops at the annual meetings. Between meetings they receive direct observation and feedback on their teaching from a local coach and participate in an online discussion group. Sessions were evaluated using a post-session survey. Overall content rating was 4.48 (out of 5). Eighty-nine percent of participants completed all requirements. Of these, 100% agreed that they had gained valuable knowledge and skills. The TEACH certificate program provides inexperienced faculty teachers an opportunity to develop core skills. Satisfaction is high. Future research should focus on the impact that this and similar programs have on teaching skills.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 51 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 51 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Librarian 5 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 8%
Student > Master 4 8%
Unspecified 3 6%
Other 3 6%
Other 14 27%
Unknown 18 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 16 31%
Social Sciences 5 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 6%
Unspecified 3 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 4%
Other 5 10%
Unknown 17 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 October 2021.
All research outputs
#4,768,762
of 23,911,072 outputs
Outputs from Journal of General Internal Medicine
#2,957
of 7,806 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#81,662
of 312,916 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of General Internal Medicine
#30
of 89 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,911,072 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,806 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 312,916 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 89 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.