↓ Skip to main content

Primary hypothyroidism and nipple hypoplasia in a girl with Wolcott–Rallison syndrome

Overview of attention for article published in European Journal of Pediatrics, November 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (68th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (73rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
27 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Primary hypothyroidism and nipple hypoplasia in a girl with Wolcott–Rallison syndrome
Published in
European Journal of Pediatrics, November 2013
DOI 10.1007/s00431-013-2189-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Anita Špehar Uroić, Vjosa Mulliqi Kotori, Nataša Rojnić Putarek, Vesna Kušec, Miroslav Dumić

Abstract

Wolcott-Rallison syndrome (WRS), caused by mutation in the EIF2AK3 gene encoding the PERK enzyme, is the most common cause of permanent neonatal diabetes mellitus (PNDM) in consanguineous families and isolated populations. Besides PNDM, it also includes skeletal abnormalities, liver and renal dysfunction, and other inconsistently present features. We present two siblings, who are WRS patients, and are Albanians from Kosovo born to unrelated parents. The older sister presented with PNDM, exocrine pancreatic insufficiency, short stature, microcephaly, normocytic anemia, delay in speech development, skeletal abnormalities, primary hypothyroidism, and hypoplastic nipples. Sequencing of the EIF2AK3 gene identified a homozygous mutation R902X in exon 13. The younger brother was diagnosed with PNDM and died from hepatic failure suggesting that he has been suffering from WRS as well. Including one previously reported patient from Kosovo carrying the same homozygous mutation, there are three WRS patients from this very small, ethnically homogenous region suggesting founder effect in this population.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 27 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Croatia 1 4%
Unknown 26 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 5 19%
Researcher 4 15%
Student > Postgraduate 4 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 11%
Student > Bachelor 2 7%
Other 5 19%
Unknown 4 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 16 59%
Computer Science 2 7%
Psychology 2 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 4%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 5 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 September 2020.
All research outputs
#6,932,073
of 22,729,647 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Pediatrics
#1,320
of 3,676 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#64,963
of 215,641 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Pediatrics
#11
of 52 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,729,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,676 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 215,641 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 52 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.