You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Multicenter Voxel-Based Morphometry Mega-Analysis of Structural Brain Scans in Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
American Journal of Psychiatry, March 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1176/appi.ajp.2013.13040574 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Stella J. de Wit, Pino Alonso, Lizanne Schweren, David Mataix-Cols, Christine Lochner, José M. Menchón, Dan J. Stein, Jean-Paul Fouche, Carles Soriano-Mas, Joao R. Sato, Marcelo Q. Hoexter, Damiaan Denys, Takashi Nakamae, Seiji Nishida, Jun Soo Kwon, Joon Hwan Jang, Geraldo F. Busatto, Narcís Cardoner, Danielle C. Cath, Kenji Fukui, Wi Hoon Jung, Sung Nyun Kim, Euripides C. Miguel, Jin Narumoto, Mary L. Phillips, Jesus Pujol, Peter L. Remijnse, Yuki Sakai, Na Young Shin, Kei Yamada, Dick J. Veltman, Odile A. van den Heuvel |
| Abstract |
Results from structural neuroimaging studies of obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) have been only partially consistent. The authors sought to assess regional gray and white matter volume differences between large samples of OCD patients and healthy comparison subjects and their relation with demographic and clinical variables. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 17% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 17% |
| Unknown | 4 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 50% |
| Scientists | 2 | 33% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 17% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 283 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 2 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 276 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 39 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 39 | 14% |
| Researcher | 35 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 23 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 22 | 8% |
| Other | 61 | 22% |
| Unknown | 64 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 62 | 22% |
| Psychology | 59 | 21% |
| Neuroscience | 27 | 10% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 20 | 7% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 6 | 2% |
| Other | 23 | 8% |
| Unknown | 86 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 March 2014.
All research outputs
#7,697,099
of 23,577,654 outputs
Outputs from American Journal of Psychiatry
#3,873
of 7,431 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#74,565
of 223,621 outputs
Outputs of similar age from American Journal of Psychiatry
#32
of 45 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,577,654 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,431 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.7. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 223,621 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 45 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.