↓ Skip to main content

Developmental Personality Types From Childhood to Adolescence: Associations With Parenting and Adjustment

Overview of attention for article published in Child Development, March 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
25 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
103 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Developmental Personality Types From Childhood to Adolescence: Associations With Parenting and Adjustment
Published in
Child Development, March 2013
DOI 10.1111/cdev.12092
Pubmed ID
Authors

Amaranta D. de Haan, Maja Deković, Alithe L. van den Akker, Sabine E. M. J. Stoltz, Peter Prinzie

Abstract

This study examined whether changes in children's self-reported Big Five dimensions are represented by (developmental) personality types, using a cohort-sequential design with three measurement occasions across 5 years (four cohorts, 9-12 years at T1; N = 523). Correlates of, and gender differences in, type membership were examined. Latent class growth modeling yielded three personality types: Resilients (highest initial levels on all Big Five), Overcontrollers (lowest Extraversion, Emotional Stability, Imagination), and Undercontrollers (lowest Benevolence, Conscientiousness). Gender differences in type membership were small. Warm parenting, but not overreactive discipline, in childhood was associated with type membership. The types differed in adjustment problems by the end of middle adolescence. Personality change more likely occurs at the level of dimensions within types than in type membership.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 103 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 101 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 21 20%
Researcher 14 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 8%
Student > Bachelor 6 6%
Other 18 17%
Unknown 23 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 53 51%
Social Sciences 7 7%
Business, Management and Accounting 4 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 3%
Neuroscience 2 2%
Other 4 4%
Unknown 30 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 June 2014.
All research outputs
#14,268,704
of 24,558,777 outputs
Outputs from Child Development
#3,721
of 4,513 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#108,025
of 201,643 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Child Development
#32
of 54 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,558,777 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,513 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 26.0. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 201,643 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 54 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.