↓ Skip to main content

Making the failure more productive: scaffolding the invention process to improve inquiry behaviors and outcomes in invention activities

Overview of attention for article published in Instructional Science, November 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#35 of 463)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
60 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
164 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Making the failure more productive: scaffolding the invention process to improve inquiry behaviors and outcomes in invention activities
Published in
Instructional Science, November 2013
DOI 10.1007/s11251-013-9300-7
Authors

N. G. Holmes, James Day, Anthony H. K. Park, D. A. Bonn, Ido Roll

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 164 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 162 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 33 20%
Student > Master 26 16%
Student > Doctoral Student 15 9%
Researcher 14 9%
Student > Bachelor 11 7%
Other 36 22%
Unknown 29 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 51 31%
Psychology 23 14%
Physics and Astronomy 10 6%
Computer Science 8 5%
Engineering 7 4%
Other 31 19%
Unknown 34 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 October 2015.
All research outputs
#2,452,718
of 22,731,677 outputs
Outputs from Instructional Science
#35
of 463 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#29,545
of 302,015 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Instructional Science
#1
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,731,677 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 463 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 302,015 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.