↓ Skip to main content

Famine in childhood and postmenopausal coronary artery calcification: a cohort study

Overview of attention for article published in BMJ Open, November 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

peer_reviews
1 peer review site
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
21 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Famine in childhood and postmenopausal coronary artery calcification: a cohort study
Published in
BMJ Open, November 2013
DOI 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-003818
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nikmah S Idris, Cuno S P M Uiterwaal, Yvonne T van der Schouw, Annet F M van Abeelen, Tessa J Roseboom, Pim A de Jong, Annemarieke Rutten, Diederick E Grobbee, Sjoerd G Elias

Abstract

To assess the effects of famine exposure during childhood on coronary calcium deposition and, secondarily, on cardiac valve and aortic calcifications.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 21 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 21 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 24%
Student > Master 5 24%
Researcher 3 14%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 1 5%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 5%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 6 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 8 38%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 10%
Environmental Science 1 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 5%
Social Sciences 1 5%
Other 1 5%
Unknown 7 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 November 2013.
All research outputs
#15,351,826
of 25,654,806 outputs
Outputs from BMJ Open
#16,258
of 25,849 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#181,246
of 322,346 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMJ Open
#149
of 241 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,654,806 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 25,849 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.1. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 322,346 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 241 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.