You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Creating an Online World Flora by 2020: a perspective from South Africa
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Biodiversity and Conservation, November 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10531-013-0595-0 |
| Authors |
Janine E. Victor, Gideon F. Smith, Nicholas J. Turland, Marianne le Roux, Alan Paton, Estrela Figueiredo, Neil R. Crouch, Abraham E. van Wyk, Denis Filer, Erich van Wyk |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 50% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
| Scientists | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 31 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 2 | 6% |
| Germany | 1 | 3% |
| Italy | 1 | 3% |
| Indonesia | 1 | 3% |
| Denmark | 1 | 3% |
| United States | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 24 | 77% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 8 | 26% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 19% |
| Other | 3 | 10% |
| Professor | 3 | 10% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 3 | 10% |
| Other | 5 | 16% |
| Unknown | 3 | 10% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 18 | 58% |
| Environmental Science | 3 | 10% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 2 | 6% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 6% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 2 | 6% |
| Unknown | 3 | 10% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 February 2014.
All research outputs
#16,171,492
of 23,854,458 outputs
Outputs from Biodiversity and Conservation
#1,889
of 2,319 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#199,158
of 313,909 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biodiversity and Conservation
#16
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,854,458 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,319 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.6. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 313,909 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.