↓ Skip to main content

Safety reporting on implantation of autologous adipose tissue-derived stem cells with platelet-rich plasma into human articular joints

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, December 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
3 X users
patent
1 patent
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
131 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
205 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Safety reporting on implantation of autologous adipose tissue-derived stem cells with platelet-rich plasma into human articular joints
Published in
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, December 2013
DOI 10.1186/1471-2474-14-337
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jaewoo Pak, Jae-Jin Chang, Jung Hun Lee, Sang Hee Lee

Abstract

Adipose tissue-derived stem cells (ADSCs), a type of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs), have great potential as therapeutic agents in regenerative medicine. Numerous animal studies have documented the multipotency of ADSCs, showing their capabilities to differentiate into tissues such as muscle, bone, cartilage, and tendon. However, the safety of autologous ADSC injections into human joints is only beginning to be understood and the data are lacking.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 205 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 2%
Spain 2 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Korea, Republic of 1 <1%
Unknown 195 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 31 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 23 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 21 10%
Student > Bachelor 19 9%
Other 18 9%
Other 55 27%
Unknown 38 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 79 39%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 26 13%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 17 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 4%
Engineering 6 3%
Other 21 10%
Unknown 48 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 January 2016.
All research outputs
#3,780,943
of 23,577,654 outputs
Outputs from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#733
of 4,162 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#44,040
of 311,089 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#9
of 91 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,577,654 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,162 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 311,089 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 91 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.