↓ Skip to main content

Do healthier foods and diet patterns cost more than less healthy options? A systematic review and meta-analysis

Overview of attention for article published in BMJ Open, December 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#9 of 25,935)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
516 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
931 Mendeley
citeulike
7 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Do healthier foods and diet patterns cost more than less healthy options? A systematic review and meta-analysis
Published in
BMJ Open, December 2013
DOI 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-004277
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mayuree Rao, Ashkan Afshin, Gitanjali Singh, Dariush Mozaffarian

Abstract

To conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of prices of healthier versus less healthy foods/diet patterns while accounting for key sources of heterogeneity.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 352 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 931 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 7 <1%
United Kingdom 3 <1%
Netherlands 2 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 913 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 185 20%
Student > Master 168 18%
Researcher 99 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 82 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 44 5%
Other 138 15%
Unknown 215 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 134 14%
Nursing and Health Professions 119 13%
Social Sciences 100 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 83 9%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 35 4%
Other 205 22%
Unknown 255 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1631. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 April 2024.
All research outputs
#6,833
of 25,791,949 outputs
Outputs from BMJ Open
#9
of 25,935 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#34
of 322,421 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMJ Open
#1
of 268 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,791,949 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 25,935 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 322,421 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 268 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.