You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
End-User Development
|
---|---|
Published by |
Lecture notes in computer science, January 2009
|
DOI | 10.1007/978-3-642-00427-8 |
ISBNs |
978-3-64-200425-4, 978-3-64-200427-8
|
Editors |
Volkmar Pipek, Mary Beth Rosson, Boris de Ruyter, Volker Wulf |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 12 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
South Africa | 1 | 8% |
Unknown | 11 | 92% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 8% |
Student > Bachelor | 1 | 8% |
Unknown | 10 | 83% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Computer Science | 1 | 8% |
Engineering | 1 | 8% |
Unknown | 10 | 83% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 January 2022.
All research outputs
#7,951,759
of 23,936,264 outputs
Outputs from Lecture notes in computer science
#2,503
of 8,168 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#50,642
of 174,920 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Lecture notes in computer science
#59
of 180 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,936,264 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,168 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 174,920 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 180 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.