↓ Skip to main content

Nitric oxide signaling in mechanical adaptation of bone

Overview of attention for article published in Osteoporosis International, December 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
81 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
96 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Nitric oxide signaling in mechanical adaptation of bone
Published in
Osteoporosis International, December 2013
DOI 10.1007/s00198-013-2590-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

J. Klein-Nulend, R. F. M. van Oers, A. D. Bakker, R. G. Bacabac

Abstract

One of the most serious healthcare problems in the world is bone loss and fractures due to a lack of physical activity in elderly people as well as in bedridden patients or otherwise inactive youth. Crucial here are the osteocytes. Buried within our bones, these cells are believed to be the mechanosensors that stimulate bone formation in the presence of mechanical stimuli and bone resorption in the absence of such stimuli. Intercellular signaling is an important physiological phenomenon involved in maintaining homeostasis in all tissues. In bone, intercellular communication via chemical signals like NO plays a critical role in the dynamic process of bone remodeling. If bones are mechanically loaded, fluid flows through minute channels in the bone matrix, resulting in shear stress on the cell membrane that activates the osteocyte. Activated osteocytes produce signaling molecules like NO, which modulate the activity of the bone-forming osteoblasts and the bone-resorbing osteoclasts, thereby orchestrating bone adaptation to mechanical loading. In this review, we highlight current insights in the role of NO in the mechanical adaptation of bone mass and structure, with emphasis on its role in local bone gain and loss as well as in remodeling supervised by osteocytes. Since mechanical stimuli and NO production enhance bone strength and fracture resistance, these new insights may facilitate the development of novel osteoporosis treatments.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 96 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Italy 2 2%
United States 1 1%
Canada 1 1%
Unknown 92 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 21%
Researcher 17 18%
Student > Bachelor 16 17%
Student > Master 12 13%
Other 4 4%
Other 10 10%
Unknown 17 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 17 18%
Medicine and Dentistry 16 17%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 15 16%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 13 14%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 2%
Other 12 13%
Unknown 21 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 December 2013.
All research outputs
#20,213,623
of 22,736,112 outputs
Outputs from Osteoporosis International
#2,962
of 3,603 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#266,979
of 306,799 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Osteoporosis International
#22
of 27 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,736,112 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,603 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 306,799 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 27 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.