You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Meta‐regression of inhibition in ID
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, July 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1111/jir.12068 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
A. Bexkens, L. Ruzzano, A. M. L. Collot d' Escury‐Koenigs, M. W. Van der Molen, H. M. Huizenga |
| Abstract |
Individuals with intellectual disabilities (ID) are characterised by inhibition deficits; however, the magnitude of these deficits is still subject to debate. This meta-analytic study therefore has two aims: first to assess the magnitude of inhibition deficits in ID, and second to investigate inhibition type, age, IQ and the presence/absence of comorbid problems as potential moderators of effect sizes. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 50% |
| Canada | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 1 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 50% |
| Scientists | 2 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 106 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 2% |
| Unknown | 104 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 27 | 25% |
| Student > Master | 19 | 18% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 11 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 8% |
| Researcher | 8 | 8% |
| Other | 18 | 17% |
| Unknown | 15 | 14% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 52 | 49% |
| Social Sciences | 10 | 9% |
| Neuroscience | 8 | 8% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 6% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 10 | 9% |
| Unknown | 17 | 16% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 December 2016.
All research outputs
#14,079,604
of 24,542,484 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Intellectual Disability Research
#917
of 1,492 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#104,790
of 203,297 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Intellectual Disability Research
#12
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,542,484 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,492 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.0. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 203,297 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.