You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Cue Reactivity Is Associated with Duration and Severity of Alcohol Dependence: An fMRI Study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, January 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0084560 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Zsuzsika Sjoerds, Wim van den Brink, Aartjan T. F. Beekman, Brenda W. J. H. Penninx, Dick J. Veltman |
| Abstract |
With the progression of substance dependence, drug cue-related brain activation is thought to shift from motivational towards habit pathways. However, a direct association between cue-induced brain activation and dependence duration has not yet been shown. We therefore examined the relationship between alcohol cue-reactivity in the brain, cue-induced subjective craving and alcohol dependence duration and severity. Since alcohol dependence is highly comorbid with depression/anxiety, which may modulate brain responses to alcohol cues, we also examined the relation between comorbid depression/anxiety and cue-reactivity. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Netherlands | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 111 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Netherlands | 2 | 2% |
| United States | 2 | 2% |
| Germany | 2 | 2% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 104 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 26 | 23% |
| Researcher | 15 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 12 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 11 | 10% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 6 | 5% |
| Other | 14 | 13% |
| Unknown | 27 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 36 | 32% |
| Neuroscience | 15 | 14% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 13 | 12% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 5% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 4 | 4% |
| Unknown | 34 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 September 2014.
All research outputs
#17,532,071
of 25,703,943 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#159,467
of 223,999 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#204,358
of 320,654 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#3,435
of 5,333 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,703,943 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 223,999 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.8. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 320,654 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5,333 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.