↓ Skip to main content

Drought stress responses in crops

Overview of attention for article published in Functional & Integrative Genomics, January 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#28 of 554)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (81st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
7 X users
facebook
5 Facebook pages

Readers on

mendeley
338 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Drought stress responses in crops
Published in
Functional & Integrative Genomics, January 2014
DOI 10.1007/s10142-013-0356-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Arun K. Shanker, M. Maheswari, S. K. Yadav, S. Desai, Divya Bhanu, Neha Bajaj Attal, B. Venkateswarlu

Abstract

Among the effects of impending climate change, drought will have a profound impact on crop productivity in the future. Response to drought stress has been studied widely, and the model plant Arabidopsis has guided the studies on crop plants with genome sequence information viz., rice, wheat, maize and sorghum. Since the value of functions of genes, dynamics of pathways and interaction of networks for drought tolerance in plants can only be judged by evidence from field performance, this mini-review provides a research update focussing on the current developments on the response to drought in crop plants. Studies in Arabidopsis provide the basis for interpreting the available information in a systems biology perspective. In particular, the elucidation of the mechanism of drought stress response in crops is considered from evidence-based outputs emerging from recent omic studies in crops.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 338 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Mexico 3 <1%
India 2 <1%
Germany 2 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
United States 2 <1%
Sri Lanka 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 323 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 74 22%
Researcher 56 17%
Student > Master 55 16%
Student > Doctoral Student 24 7%
Student > Bachelor 17 5%
Other 46 14%
Unknown 66 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 188 56%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 36 11%
Engineering 7 2%
Environmental Science 6 2%
Computer Science 4 1%
Other 12 4%
Unknown 85 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 May 2015.
All research outputs
#4,687,749
of 23,577,654 outputs
Outputs from Functional & Integrative Genomics
#28
of 554 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#55,267
of 308,863 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Functional & Integrative Genomics
#1
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,577,654 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 554 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 308,863 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them