↓ Skip to main content

Time course of low- and high-volume strength training on neuromuscular adaptations and muscle quality in older women

Overview of attention for article published in GeroScience, January 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (52nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
105 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
209 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Time course of low- and high-volume strength training on neuromuscular adaptations and muscle quality in older women
Published in
GeroScience, January 2014
DOI 10.1007/s11357-013-9611-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Regis Radaelli, Cíntia E. Botton, Eurico N. Wilhelm, Martim Bottaro, Lee E. Brown, Fabiano Lacerda, Anelise Gaya, Kelly Moraes, Amanda Peruzzolo, Ronei S. Pinto

Abstract

This study investigated the effects of low- and high-volume strength trainings on neuromuscular adaptations of lower- and upper-body muscles in older women after 6 weeks (6WE), 13 weeks (13WE), and 20 weeks (20WE) of training. Healthy older women were assigned to low-volume (LV) or high-volume (HV) training groups. The LV group performed one set of each exercise, while the HV group performed three sets, 2 days/week. Knee extension and elbow flexion one-repetition maximum (1-RM), maximal isometric strength, maximal muscle activation, and muscle thickness (MT) of the lower- and upper-body muscles, as well as lower-body muscle quality (MQ) obtained by ultrasonography, were evaluated. Knee extension and elbow flexion 1-RM improved at all time points for both groups; however, knee extension 1-RM gains were greater for the HV group after 20WE. Maximal isometric strength of the lower body for both groups increased only at 20WE, while upper-body maximal isometric strength increased after 13WE and 20WE. Maximal activation of the lower and upper body for both groups increased only after 20WE. Both groups showed significant increases in MT of their lower and upper body, with greater gains in lower-body MT for the HV group at 20WE. MQ improved in both groups after 13WE and 20WE, whereas the HV group improved more than the LV group at 20WE. These results showed that low- and high-volume trainings have a similar adaptation time course in the muscular function of upper-body muscles. However, high-volume training appears to be more efficient for lower-body muscles after 20 weeks of training.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 209 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 205 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 36 17%
Student > Master 34 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 22 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 17 8%
Researcher 16 8%
Other 32 15%
Unknown 52 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Sports and Recreations 76 36%
Nursing and Health Professions 19 9%
Medicine and Dentistry 16 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 5%
Social Sciences 6 3%
Other 17 8%
Unknown 65 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 August 2021.
All research outputs
#7,847,862
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from GeroScience
#815
of 1,594 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#86,558
of 319,458 outputs
Outputs of similar age from GeroScience
#8
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,594 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.0. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 319,458 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.