↓ Skip to main content

Body-Mass Index and Mortality among Adults with Incident Type 2 Diabetes

Overview of attention for article published in New England Journal of Medicine, January 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
46 news outlets
blogs
3 blogs
policy
1 policy source
twitter
128 X users
facebook
15 Facebook pages
reddit
1 Redditor

Citations

dimensions_citation
364 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
404 Mendeley
citeulike
5 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Body-Mass Index and Mortality among Adults with Incident Type 2 Diabetes
Published in
New England Journal of Medicine, January 2014
DOI 10.1056/nejmoa1304501
Pubmed ID
Authors

Deirdre K Tobias, An Pan, Chandra L Jackson, Eilis J O'Reilly, Eric L Ding, Walter C Willett, JoAnn E Manson, Frank B Hu

Abstract

The relation between body weight and mortality among persons with type 2 diabetes remains unresolved, with some studies suggesting decreased mortality among overweight or obese persons as compared with normal-weight persons (an "obesity paradox").

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 128 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 404 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 9 2%
Japan 5 1%
Spain 4 <1%
United Kingdom 3 <1%
Brazil 2 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Morocco 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Korea, Republic of 1 <1%
Other 4 <1%
Unknown 373 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 77 19%
Student > Bachelor 53 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 49 12%
Other 33 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 30 7%
Other 100 25%
Unknown 62 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 195 48%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 38 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 25 6%
Social Sciences 12 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 10 2%
Other 41 10%
Unknown 83 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 474. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 September 2023.
All research outputs
#57,258
of 25,563,770 outputs
Outputs from New England Journal of Medicine
#1,826
of 32,566 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#431
of 320,756 outputs
Outputs of similar age from New England Journal of Medicine
#11
of 286 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,563,770 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 32,566 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 122.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 320,756 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 286 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.