↓ Skip to main content

Complementary Alternative Medicine for Children with Autism: A Physician Survey

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, March 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
2 blogs
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Readers on

mendeley
168 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Complementary Alternative Medicine for Children with Autism: A Physician Survey
Published in
Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, March 2009
DOI 10.1007/s10803-009-0714-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Allison E. Golnik, Marjorie Ireland

Abstract

Previous studies suggest over half of children with autism are using complementary alternative medicine (CAM). In this study, physicians responded (n = 539, 19% response rate) to a survey regarding CAM use in children with autism. Physicians encouraged multi-vitamins (49%), essential fatty acids (25%), melatonin (25%) and probiotics (19%) and discouraged withholding immunizations (76%), chelation (61%), anti-infectives (57%), delaying immunizations (55%) and secretin (43%). Physicians encouraging CAM were more likely to desire CAM training, inquire about CAM use, be female, be younger, and report greater autism visits, autism education and CAM knowledge. Physicians were more likely to desire CAM training, inquire about CAM and view CAM as a challenge for children with autism compared to children with other neurodevelopmental and chronic/complex conditions.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 168 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 2 1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 163 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 31 18%
Researcher 26 15%
Student > Master 22 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 11%
Student > Postgraduate 13 8%
Other 36 21%
Unknown 22 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 43 26%
Psychology 27 16%
Nursing and Health Professions 19 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 17 10%
Social Sciences 9 5%
Other 26 15%
Unknown 27 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 24. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 June 2021.
All research outputs
#1,455,411
of 23,867,274 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
#597
of 5,240 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,952
of 96,974 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
#3
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,867,274 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,240 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 96,974 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.