↓ Skip to main content

Performance of Integrated FDG-PET/CT for Differentiating Benign and Malignant Lung Lesions -Results from a Large Prospective Clinical Trial

Overview of attention for article published in Molecular Imaging and Biology, January 2008
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
15 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Performance of Integrated FDG-PET/CT for Differentiating Benign and Malignant Lung Lesions -Results from a Large Prospective Clinical Trial
Published in
Molecular Imaging and Biology, January 2008
DOI 10.1007/s11307-007-0129-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sandra Pauls, Andreas K. Buck, Gisela Halter, Felix M. Mottaghy, Rainer Muche, Christina Bluemel, Susanne Gerstner, Stefan Krüger, Gerhard Glatting, Ludger Sunder-Plassmann, Peter Möller, Hans-Jürgen Brambs, Sven N. Reske

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 15 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 1 7%
Unknown 14 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 3 20%
Student > Postgraduate 3 20%
Other 2 13%
Student > Master 2 13%
Lecturer 1 7%
Other 2 13%
Unknown 2 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 9 60%
Social Sciences 1 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 7%
Unknown 4 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 January 2012.
All research outputs
#8,535,684
of 25,377,790 outputs
Outputs from Molecular Imaging and Biology
#244
of 837 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#45,113
of 166,887 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Molecular Imaging and Biology
#2
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,377,790 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 837 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.0. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 166,887 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.