You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Minimally invasive versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a meta-analysis based on the current evidence
|
---|---|
Published in |
European Spine Journal, April 2013
|
DOI | 10.1007/s00586-013-2747-z |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Nai-Feng Tian, Yao-Sen Wu, Xiao-Lei Zhang, Hua-Zi Xu, Yong-Long Chi, Fang-Min Mao |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 95 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Lebanon | 1 | 1% |
United States | 1 | 1% |
South Africa | 1 | 1% |
Brazil | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 91 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 21 | 22% |
Other | 10 | 11% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 10 | 11% |
Student > Postgraduate | 9 | 9% |
Student > Master | 8 | 8% |
Other | 16 | 17% |
Unknown | 21 | 22% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 50 | 53% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 5% |
Engineering | 3 | 3% |
Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 2 | 2% |
Materials Science | 2 | 2% |
Other | 6 | 6% |
Unknown | 27 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 November 2016.
All research outputs
#4,743,806
of 22,977,819 outputs
Outputs from European Spine Journal
#549
of 4,662 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#40,897
of 200,277 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Spine Journal
#12
of 47 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,977,819 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,662 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 200,277 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 47 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.