You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Psychological treatments for depression and anxiety in dementia and mild cognitive impairment
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd009125.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Vasiliki Orgeta, Afifa Qazi, Aimee E Spector, Martin Orrell |
| Abstract |
Experiencing anxiety and depression is very common in people with dementia and mild cognitive impairment (MCI). Psychological interventions have been suggested as a potential treatment for these populations. Current research suggests that people with dementia and MCI have limited opportunities for psychological treatments aimed at improving their well-being. A systematic review of the evidence on their effectiveness is likely to be useful in terms of improving outcomes for patients and for future recommendations for practice. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 31 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 5 | 16% |
| France | 2 | 6% |
| Canada | 2 | 6% |
| Spain | 2 | 6% |
| Argentina | 1 | 3% |
| Germany | 1 | 3% |
| Finland | 1 | 3% |
| Portugal | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 16 | 52% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 24 | 77% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 10% |
| Scientists | 3 | 10% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 443 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Belgium | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Japan | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 438 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 67 | 15% |
| Researcher | 61 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 50 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 48 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 36 | 8% |
| Other | 72 | 16% |
| Unknown | 109 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 110 | 25% |
| Psychology | 79 | 18% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 62 | 14% |
| Social Sciences | 17 | 4% |
| Neuroscience | 9 | 2% |
| Other | 42 | 9% |
| Unknown | 124 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 83. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 May 2023.
All research outputs
#524,198
of 25,806,763 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#912
of 13,140 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,151
of 323,114 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#21
of 252 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,806,763 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,140 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 323,114 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 252 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.